<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[GCTIP Forums - All Forums]]></title>
		<link>http://forums.gctip.org/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[GCTIP Forums - http://forums.gctip.org]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:13:16 -0700</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Net Neutrality Discovered to Be a Marxist/Communist Plot!]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-54-post-182.html#pid182</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:10:24 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tijani</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-54-post-182.html#pid182</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[the videos by beck are always entertaining . . . :-D<br />
net neutrality is a new way it combines the most visited sites like e-bay,amazon etc etc . . .]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[the videos by beck are always entertaining . . . :-D<br />
net neutrality is a new way it combines the most visited sites like e-bay,amazon etc etc . . .]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA["Terms of Service": Do You Want to Run Your Own Servers? Does Your ISP Forbid This?]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-51-post-181.html#pid181</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:06:26 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tijani</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-51-post-181.html#pid181</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[obviously ,if i get a chance to get my own i surely get an own browser.<br />
as em a business man and i need to use internet almost more than 16 hours.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[obviously ,if i get a chance to get my own i surely get an own browser.<br />
as em a business man and i need to use internet almost more than 16 hours.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA["Freedom is Slavery" - Senator McCain introduces bill to block FCC Net Neutrality]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-49-post-180.html#pid180</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:59:06 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tijani</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-49-post-180.html#pid180</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[it does infect the customers. as most of the business now a days is online so it do effect the customer and they go for another network.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[it does infect the customers. as most of the business now a days is online so it do effect the customer and they go for another network.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[FCC: Broadband Speeds Often Slower than Advertised]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-44-post-179.html#pid179</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:57:11 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tijani</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-44-post-179.html#pid179</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[it is common in all over the world that the speed advertised is mostly high than the speed you get .<br />
specially the downloading speed.many of my friends in other countries also have this problem.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[it is common in all over the world that the speed advertised is mostly high than the speed you get .<br />
specially the downloading speed.many of my friends in other countries also have this problem.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[TW and Comcast exploring online access to broadcast and cable TV programming]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-15-post-178.html#pid178</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:00:48 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>iamtod</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-15-post-178.html#pid178</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Those are my quotes from above, but Tristan got em a little tweaked.<br />
<br />
I lived in Clearwater and Tampa FL from around 2004-2009, and at both places they required me to get their triple packages to get the 10/2 connection, and while trying to order the service here in Lakeland they once again required the triple package. <br />
<br />
I just talked with a friend who's still on brighthouse, and he claims he had the old top of the line 10/2 data package independently (at the same time they required me to have all 3). However, he gets free cable tv through his condo association (legally), so I think they had some sort of agreement with BH to allow this. He dropped to the 'lite' service later on, and then tried to upgrade again, and they wouldn't let him. <br />
<br />
While on a road trip, we stayed with someone who was bitching about Comcast requiring all 3 services to get the top of the fastest speeds. Though it appears this is already known.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Those are my quotes from above, but Tristan got em a little tweaked.<br />
<br />
I lived in Clearwater and Tampa FL from around 2004-2009, and at both places they required me to get their triple packages to get the 10/2 connection, and while trying to order the service here in Lakeland they once again required the triple package. <br />
<br />
I just talked with a friend who's still on brighthouse, and he claims he had the old top of the line 10/2 data package independently (at the same time they required me to have all 3). However, he gets free cable tv through his condo association (legally), so I think they had some sort of agreement with BH to allow this. He dropped to the 'lite' service later on, and then tried to upgrade again, and they wouldn't let him. <br />
<br />
While on a road trip, we stayed with someone who was bitching about Comcast requiring all 3 services to get the top of the fastest speeds. Though it appears this is already known.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[TW and Comcast exploring online access to broadcast and cable TV programming]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-15-post-177.html#pid177</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:34:19 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tristanbobistan</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-15-post-177.html#pid177</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<blockquote><cite><span> (02-25-2009 09:28 AM)</span>lauren Wrote: <a href="http://forums.gctip.org/post-47.html#pid47" class="quick_jump">&nbsp;</a></cite>Can anyone report other ISPs that are restricting higher speed Internet service tiers to customers who are also subscribing to affiliated phone and/or television services?  If memory serves me correctly, AT&#x26;T U-verse Internet access may currently only be available at the residential (non-business) level in a similar manner, though it may be possible to cancel the non-Internet services at a later time and still keep U-verse Internet.  Clarification on this by any U-verse subscribers would be appreciated.<br />
<br />
--Lauren--</blockquote>
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Todd:</span> I went to visit my buddy, and the other person that was with me was ragging on him for having a land line<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Todd:</span> and he said it was required to get the top internet<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Todd:</span> shit, the only way you can get internet from brighthouse is w/ either a phone or TV package<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Todd:</span> I fought tooth and nail trying to get just internet<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Todd:</span> okay I just talked to my buddy, he's got the television free through his condo association, <span style="font-weight: bold;">and then he was able to get their lite internet alone</span><br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Todd:</span> but that's all he could get<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Todd:</span> anything faster than the lite requires a combo, and obviously they don't even offer that anymore<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://img541.imageshack.us/img541/8798/tmp3u5yhg.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://img541.imageshack.us/img541/8798/tmp3u5yhg.png" border="0" alt="[Image: tmp3u5yhg.png&#93;" /></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><cite><span> (02-25-2009 09:28 AM)</span>lauren Wrote: <a href="http://forums.gctip.org/post-47.html#pid47" class="quick_jump">&nbsp;</a></cite>Can anyone report other ISPs that are restricting higher speed Internet service tiers to customers who are also subscribing to affiliated phone and/or television services?  If memory serves me correctly, AT&T U-verse Internet access may currently only be available at the residential (non-business) level in a similar manner, though it may be possible to cancel the non-Internet services at a later time and still keep U-verse Internet.  Clarification on this by any U-verse subscribers would be appreciated.<br />
<br />
--Lauren--</blockquote>
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Todd:</span> I went to visit my buddy, and the other person that was with me was ragging on him for having a land line<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Todd:</span> and he said it was required to get the top internet<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Todd:</span> shit, the only way you can get internet from brighthouse is w/ either a phone or TV package<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Todd:</span> I fought tooth and nail trying to get just internet<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Todd:</span> okay I just talked to my buddy, he's got the television free through his condo association, <span style="font-weight: bold;">and then he was able to get their lite internet alone</span><br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Todd:</span> but that's all he could get<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Todd:</span> anything faster than the lite requires a combo, and obviously they don't even offer that anymore<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://img541.imageshack.us/img541/8798/tmp3u5yhg.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://img541.imageshack.us/img541/8798/tmp3u5yhg.png" border="0" alt="[Image: tmp3u5yhg.png]" /></a>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New YouTube Design Horrendous, Unusable]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-63-post-176.html#pid176</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 06:24:18 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jackypunker</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-63-post-176.html#pid176</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I completely disagree, I absolutely love the new design - to be specific I am talking about the new page layout the Grey border around the video, the simpler comments section, the NOT the new controversial channel layout I don't use that anyway. It's clean, unobtrusive and simple. Don't give a shit about the whole 5 star rating crap - things will either be disliked now or really liked, simple.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I completely disagree, I absolutely love the new design - to be specific I am talking about the new page layout the Grey border around the video, the simpler comments section, the NOT the new controversial channel layout I don't use that anyway. It's clean, unobtrusive and simple. Don't give a shit about the whole 5 star rating crap - things will either be disliked now or really liked, simple.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[FCC: Broadband Speeds Often Slower than Advertised]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-44-post-175.html#pid175</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 06:21:26 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jackypunker</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-44-post-175.html#pid175</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced in September that actual broadband speeds lag behind advertised speeds by as much as 50 percent to 80 percent. The FCC defines broadband as being at least 768 kilobits per second (Kbps) for download speeds. It could cost between &#36;20 billion and &#36;350 billion to accomplish the task, depending on if you want to just send e-mail with large PDF files or watch HD videos over the Web. And even the networks in place now aren't robust enough to meet the kind of traffic expected down the line. In practice, the advertised bandwidth is not always reliably available to the customer; ISPs often allow a greater number of subscribers than their backbone connection or neighborhood access network can handle, under the assumption that most users will not be using their full connection capacity very frequently.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced in September that actual broadband speeds lag behind advertised speeds by as much as 50 percent to 80 percent. The FCC defines broadband as being at least 768 kilobits per second (Kbps) for download speeds. It could cost between &#36;20 billion and &#36;350 billion to accomplish the task, depending on if you want to just send e-mail with large PDF files or watch HD videos over the Web. And even the networks in place now aren't robust enough to meet the kind of traffic expected down the line. In practice, the advertised bandwidth is not always reliably available to the customer; ISPs often allow a greater number of subscribers than their backbone connection or neighborhood access network can handle, under the assumption that most users will not be using their full connection capacity very frequently.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) -- Good, Bad, and/or Ugly?]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-20-post-174.html#pid174</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 06:18:57 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jackypunker</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-20-post-174.html#pid174</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[The uses of DPI appliances are regularly under fire by network neutrality advocates, privacy advocates, and people who are generally concerned about communication infrastructure. DPI lets network operators ‘penetrate’ data packets that are routed through their networks and this practice is ‘new’, insofar as prior networking appliances were generally prevented from inspecting the actual payload, or content, of the data packets that are shuttled across the ‘net. Virtualization giant VMware has launched a new product vSphere 4 positioned as the first cloud computing operating system combining under one roof a diverse set of dynamic virtualization management tools.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The uses of DPI appliances are regularly under fire by network neutrality advocates, privacy advocates, and people who are generally concerned about communication infrastructure. DPI lets network operators ‘penetrate’ data packets that are routed through their networks and this practice is ‘new’, insofar as prior networking appliances were generally prevented from inspecting the actual payload, or content, of the data packets that are shuttled across the ‘net. Virtualization giant VMware has launched a new product vSphere 4 positioned as the first cloud computing operating system combining under one roof a diverse set of dynamic virtualization management tools.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[FCC Launches OpenInternet.gov Web Site]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-40-post-173.html#pid173</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 06:16:13 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jackypunker</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-40-post-173.html#pid173</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[In light of these emerging challenges and uncertainties about existing policies, last month the FCC began a process to seek public input on draft rules of the road that would clarify and supplement current FCC policies to protect the open Internet. These basic, high-level rules would ensure that broadband providers don’t block consumers from accessing the content and applications of their choice, don’t deprive consumers of their entitlement to competition, and don’t discriminate against or in favor of traffic, and they would require broadband providers to disclose basic information about broadband service.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In light of these emerging challenges and uncertainties about existing policies, last month the FCC began a process to seek public input on draft rules of the road that would clarify and supplement current FCC policies to protect the open Internet. These basic, high-level rules would ensure that broadband providers don’t block consumers from accessing the content and applications of their choice, don’t deprive consumers of their entitlement to competition, and don’t discriminate against or in favor of traffic, and they would require broadband providers to disclose basic information about broadband service.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Atrocious Ethics Galore in the "Lost iPhone" Case]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-75-post-172.html#pid172</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:17:34 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>polaris</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-75-post-172.html#pid172</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[It all seems too perfect (a play) to be a 'believable imperfect reality'. These days of "Reality TV" shows galore, why can't it be a 'Reality Real-Life' show of sort. We see this all too often even in the real scandals. Of course, there may be no trail (of hard proof) behind Apple's own hand - "wink-and-nod" - publicity, and we may never know The Truth! <img src="http://forums.gctip.org/images/smilies/wink.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Wink" title="Wink" /><br />
<br />
If it's so indeed, all this mind-numbing ethics or legal analysis-es are just a side show. Even as we indulge, taking ethical and legalese sides, Apple reaps all the benefits and already a "winner", laughing all the way to the bank. <img src="http://forums.gctip.org/images/smilies/tongue.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Tongue" title="Tongue" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[It all seems too perfect (a play) to be a 'believable imperfect reality'. These days of "Reality TV" shows galore, why can't it be a 'Reality Real-Life' show of sort. We see this all too often even in the real scandals. Of course, there may be no trail (of hard proof) behind Apple's own hand - "wink-and-nod" - publicity, and we may never know The Truth! <img src="http://forums.gctip.org/images/smilies/wink.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Wink" title="Wink" /><br />
<br />
If it's so indeed, all this mind-numbing ethics or legal analysis-es are just a side show. Even as we indulge, taking ethical and legalese sides, Apple reaps all the benefits and already a "winner", laughing all the way to the bank. <img src="http://forums.gctip.org/images/smilies/tongue.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Tongue" title="Tongue" />]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Beware the "Google Voice" Phishing Attack!]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-74-post-171.html#pid171</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:07:04 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-74-post-171.html#pid171</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000709.html">"Beware the 'Google Voice' Phishing Attack!"</a><br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000709.html">"Beware the 'Google Voice' Phishing Attack!"</a><br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google, Others Help Yahoo Fight DOJ E-Mail Snooping]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-73-post-170.html#pid170</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:15:58 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-73-post-170.html#pid170</guid>
			<description><![CDATA["Google and a number of prominent pro-privacy groups <a href="http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000706.html">have come to Yahoo's defense</a> in its attempt to fight off intrusive efforts by the U.S. Department of Justice to gain access to stored e-mail contents without warrants."<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA["Google and a number of prominent pro-privacy groups <a href="http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000706.html">have come to Yahoo's defense</a> in its attempt to fight off intrusive efforts by the U.S. Department of Justice to gain access to stored e-mail contents without warrants."<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Australian Internet Content Restrictions Spinning Out of Control]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-34-post-169.html#pid169</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 19:56:34 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jasonx</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-34-post-169.html#pid169</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Being in Australia our internet infrastructure would place us in a third world country. It's amazing to see how far behind we are with the rest of the world in terms of internet infrastructure and not to mention governmental policy of further regulating what content we can and can't view.<br />
<br />
It seems like our government is more concerned on governmental policy regarding on what we can and can't view instead on delivering on its promise (<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/04/07/2537263.htm)" target="_blank">http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/...37263.htm)</a> of a faster national broadband network.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Being in Australia our internet infrastructure would place us in a third world country. It's amazing to see how far behind we are with the rest of the world in terms of internet infrastructure and not to mention governmental policy of further regulating what content we can and can't view.<br />
<br />
It seems like our government is more concerned on governmental policy regarding on what we can and can't view instead on delivering on its promise (<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/04/07/2537263.htm)" target="_blank">http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/...37263.htm)</a> of a faster national broadband network.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Video breaks up, freezes, etc. while watching YouTube fullscreen -- How to Fix?]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-72-post-168.html#pid168</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 01:57:01 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-72-post-168.html#pid168</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[This suggestion may seem counterintuitive -- and is not guaranteed to work -- but often will help drastically if you have problems with fullscreen video playback on YouTube (the actual issue is related to the Flash plugin).  The description below is for Windows users, but a similar process may be similarly useful on other platforms.<br />
<br />
Get a YouTube video up on your screen (normal window, not fullscreen).  Stop the playback for now.  Right-click on the video area itself, then left-click on Settings.<br />
<br />
Make sure that the left-most icon (lower-left of the settings box) is selected -- left-click it if necessary to select.<br />
<br />
You should see an option labeled "Enable hardware acceleration" -- if it is currently checked, left-click the box to un-check it.  If the option is already un-checked, this "solution" won't work for you!<br />
<br />
Odd as it may seem, fullscreen playback problems on YouTube seem to frequently be reduced or completely cured through this procedure of disabling hardware acceleration.<br />
<br />
Surprise!<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[This suggestion may seem counterintuitive -- and is not guaranteed to work -- but often will help drastically if you have problems with fullscreen video playback on YouTube (the actual issue is related to the Flash plugin).  The description below is for Windows users, but a similar process may be similarly useful on other platforms.<br />
<br />
Get a YouTube video up on your screen (normal window, not fullscreen).  Stop the playback for now.  Right-click on the video area itself, then left-click on Settings.<br />
<br />
Make sure that the left-most icon (lower-left of the settings box) is selected -- left-click it if necessary to select.<br />
<br />
You should see an option labeled "Enable hardware acceleration" -- if it is currently checked, left-click the box to un-check it.  If the option is already un-checked, this "solution" won't work for you!<br />
<br />
Odd as it may seem, fullscreen playback problems on YouTube seem to frequently be reduced or completely cured through this procedure of disabling hardware acceleration.<br />
<br />
Surprise!<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ISP Accused of "Hijacking" Google Search Queries and Subscribers' DNS]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-71-post-167.html#pid167</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 14:05:03 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-71-post-167.html#pid167</guid>
			<description><![CDATA["Greetings. All of the data on this situation isn't in yet, but on its face this appears to be an extremely problematic situation, seemingly involving <a href="http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000704.html">ISP 'hijacking' of their subscribers' Google-related traffic</a>."<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA["Greetings. All of the data on this situation isn't in yet, but on its face this appears to be an extremely problematic situation, seemingly involving <a href="http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000704.html">ISP 'hijacking' of their subscribers' Google-related traffic</a>."<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ISP Accused of "Hijacking" Google Search Queries and Subscribers' DNS]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-70-post-166.html#pid166</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:14:17 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-70-post-166.html#pid166</guid>
			<description><![CDATA["Greetings. All of the data on this situation isn't in yet, but on its face this appears to be an extremely problematic situation, seemingly involving <a href="http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000704.html">ISP 'hijacking' of their subscribers' Google-related traffic</a>."<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA["Greetings. All of the data on this situation isn't in yet, but on its face this appears to be an extremely problematic situation, seemingly involving <a href="http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000704.html">ISP 'hijacking' of their subscribers' Google-related traffic</a>."<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[European ISPs Threaten to Join "Content Owners" to Gang-Up on Google]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-69-post-165.html#pid165</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:09:17 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-69-post-165.html#pid165</guid>
			<description><![CDATA["Telefonica, France Telecom and Deutsche Telekom <a href="http://www.nnsquad.org/archives/nnsquad/msg03297.html">are now demanding</a> that Google "stop using their networks for free" (golly, where have we heard that canard before?) and are suggesting that ISPs should team up with Content Companies whom the ISPs claim are similarly "oppressed."<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA["Telefonica, France Telecom and Deutsche Telekom <a href="http://www.nnsquad.org/archives/nnsquad/msg03297.html">are now demanding</a> that Google "stop using their networks for free" (golly, where have we heard that canard before?) and are suggesting that ISPs should team up with Content Companies whom the ISPs claim are similarly "oppressed."<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google introduces "site speed/performance" signal to (some) search rankings]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-68-post-164.html#pid164</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:06:08 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-68-post-164.html#pid164</guid>
			<description><![CDATA["Like us, our users place a lot of value in speed — that's why we've decided to <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html">take site speed into account</a> in our search rankings." -- <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/">Google Webmaster Central Blog</a><br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA["Like us, our users place a lot of value in speed — that's why we've decided to <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html">take site speed into account</a> in our search rankings." -- <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/">Google Webmaster Central Blog</a><br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[What are some recommended Google Chrome browser extensions?]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-66-post-162.html#pid162</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 18:02:36 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-66-post-162.html#pid162</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Recommending browser extensions is perilously close to a religious discussion these days, and given the rapid pace with which new <a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions">Chrome extensions</a> are appearing any suggestions could be quickly outdated.<br />
<br />
However, here's a handful from the set of Chrome extensions I'm currently using that may be of interest:<br />
<br />
<a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/ecpgkdflcnofdbbkiggklcfmgbnbabhh">Autocomplete = on</a><br />
Tries to remember passwords even for sites that try to prevent you from saving passwords in the browser<br />
<p>
<a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/digfdjelalmeldlplgcapchelgnlkomc">ChromeMUSE</a><br />
URL shortening interface -- great for use with bit.ly and other shortening services<br />
<p>
<a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/njoipeaphfnaplplihpbgndfojhdhmjo">ChromeReload</a><br />
Automatic page reloading<br />
<p>
<a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/khpcanbeojalbkpgpmjpdkjnkfcgfkhb">Chromium Wheel Smooth Scroller</a><br />
Highly configurable smooth scrolling for mouse and keyboard<br />
<p>
<a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/mgijmajocgfcbeboacabfgobmjgjcoja">Google Dictonary</a><br />
Word definitions on demand as you browse<br />
<p>
<a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/apflmjolhbonpkbkooiamcnenbmbjcbf">Google Reader Notifier</a><br />
Gives count of items waiting in Google Reader<br />
<p>
<a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/kcnhkahnjcbndmmehfkdnkjomaanaooo">Google Voice</a><br />
Notifier and interface for Google Voice<br />
<p>
<a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/loljledaigphbcpfhfmgopdkppkifgno">Lazarus: Form Recovery</a><br />
Automatic recovery for deleted or lost form input data.  Can be a real lifesaver!<br />
<p>
<a href="http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/speedtracer/get-started.html">Speed Tracer</a><br />
Extremely comprehensive Web application performance and activity profiling tool.  Fantastic work.  Go, Speed Tracer, Go!<br />
<br />
 - - -<br />
<br />
That's just a tiny sampling.<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Recommending browser extensions is perilously close to a religious discussion these days, and given the rapid pace with which new <a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions">Chrome extensions</a> are appearing any suggestions could be quickly outdated.<br />
<br />
However, here's a handful from the set of Chrome extensions I'm currently using that may be of interest:<br />
<br />
<a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/ecpgkdflcnofdbbkiggklcfmgbnbabhh">Autocomplete = on</a><br />
Tries to remember passwords even for sites that try to prevent you from saving passwords in the browser<br />
<p>
<a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/digfdjelalmeldlplgcapchelgnlkomc">ChromeMUSE</a><br />
URL shortening interface -- great for use with bit.ly and other shortening services<br />
<p>
<a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/njoipeaphfnaplplihpbgndfojhdhmjo">ChromeReload</a><br />
Automatic page reloading<br />
<p>
<a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/khpcanbeojalbkpgpmjpdkjnkfcgfkhb">Chromium Wheel Smooth Scroller</a><br />
Highly configurable smooth scrolling for mouse and keyboard<br />
<p>
<a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/mgijmajocgfcbeboacabfgobmjgjcoja">Google Dictonary</a><br />
Word definitions on demand as you browse<br />
<p>
<a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/apflmjolhbonpkbkooiamcnenbmbjcbf">Google Reader Notifier</a><br />
Gives count of items waiting in Google Reader<br />
<p>
<a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/kcnhkahnjcbndmmehfkdnkjomaanaooo">Google Voice</a><br />
Notifier and interface for Google Voice<br />
<p>
<a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/loljledaigphbcpfhfmgopdkppkifgno">Lazarus: Form Recovery</a><br />
Automatic recovery for deleted or lost form input data.  Can be a real lifesaver!<br />
<p>
<a href="http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/speedtracer/get-started.html">Speed Tracer</a><br />
Extremely comprehensive Web application performance and activity profiling tool.  Fantastic work.  Go, Speed Tracer, Go!<br />
<br />
 - - -<br />
<br />
That's just a tiny sampling.<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google Chrome browser's "sync bookmarks" doesn't seem to work -- what gives?]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-65-post-161.html#pid161</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:55:46 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-65-post-161.html#pid161</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Actually, Google Chrome's bookmark sync function does work, but currently perhaps not in the way that you (or I) might have expected.<br />
<br />
Chrome bookmark sync (controlled from the tools menu) does not actually sync bookmarks <b>on</b> the computers designated for syncing.  Rather it syncs the bookmarks from all designated computers to a bookmarks folder in <a href="http://www.google.com/docs">Google Docs</a>, accessible via the Google Account specified via sync setup in Chrome on the computers themselves.<br />
<br />
So if you login to Google Docs using that account, you should see your synchronized bookmarks folder.<br />
<br />
Hopefully at some point soon bookmark sync will extend to actually synchronizing the bookmarks on the computers themselves, but for now the existing functionality is still very useful.<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually, Google Chrome's bookmark sync function does work, but currently perhaps not in the way that you (or I) might have expected.<br />
<br />
Chrome bookmark sync (controlled from the tools menu) does not actually sync bookmarks <b>on</b> the computers designated for syncing.  Rather it syncs the bookmarks from all designated computers to a bookmarks folder in <a href="http://www.google.com/docs">Google Docs</a>, accessible via the Google Account specified via sync setup in Chrome on the computers themselves.<br />
<br />
So if you login to Google Docs using that account, you should see your synchronized bookmarks folder.<br />
<br />
Hopefully at some point soon bookmark sync will extend to actually synchronizing the bookmarks on the computers themselves, but for now the existing functionality is still very useful.<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New YouTube Design Horrendous, Unusable]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-63-post-160.html#pid160</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 09:40:46 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-63-post-160.html#pid160</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Tell us how you <b>really</b> feel about this, Ron!  Seriously, it's clear that some aspects of the YouTube redesign have been controversial, and word is that a "redesign of aspects of the redesign" will probably be quickly forthcoming.  <br />
<br />
A  <a href="http://www.mashable.com"><i>Mashable</i></a> article from a few days ago -- <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/04/06/youtube-war-room/">"Inside YouTube’s War Room"</a> --  is explicitly focused on this issue and may be of particular interest.<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Tell us how you <b>really</b> feel about this, Ron!  Seriously, it's clear that some aspects of the YouTube redesign have been controversial, and word is that a "redesign of aspects of the redesign" will probably be quickly forthcoming.  <br />
<br />
A  <a href="http://www.mashable.com"><i>Mashable</i></a> article from a few days ago -- <a href="http://mashable.com/2010/04/06/youtube-war-room/">"Inside YouTube’s War Room"</a> --  is explicitly focused on this issue and may be of particular interest.<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[2010 CACR Higher Education Cybersecurity Summit]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-64-post-159.html#pid159</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 05:34:27 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RDEdge</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-64-post-159.html#pid159</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[In case anyone is interested:<br />
<br />
2010 CACR Higher Education Cybersecurity Summit last week in Indianapolis, sponsored and hosted by Indiana University.  Links to archived video from each of the sessions throughout the day are available at the Summit website (<a href="http://www.indiana.edu/~uits/cacrsummit10/index.html)" target="_blank">http://www.indiana.edu/~uits/cacrsummit10/index.html)</a> under the Program and Speakers menu<br />
<br />
Fred Cate, from IU law school, opened the conference. Fred has testified before Congress on issues re: privacy and the Internet, and is very active in this area. I asked the first question when he finished and opened for questions. Basically, I wanted to know what the difference was anymore between China, essentially a police state Google is fleeing, and Australia's Internet censorship efforts, and the UK, where there are now more surveillance cameras than people, it seems, including the ones in public restrooms reported recently.<br />
<br />
Fred responded so assuringly (not), by recounting how DHS is pouring money for surveillance cameras into USA municipalities, without any regard to requiring policy and oversight regulation of how they are used, how material is archived, etc.<br />
<br />
After the session that was a free form discussion by five major schools privacy officers, I started to ask them what they would be doing in five years, since privacy would essentially be dead by then.<br />
<br />
Before lunch, the featured speaker was Bruce Schneier. <a href="http://www.schneier.com/" target="_blank">http://www.schneier.com/</a><br />
<br />
Ronald D. Edge<br />
Director of Information Services<br />
Indiana University Athletics<br />
Bloomington, IN]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In case anyone is interested:<br />
<br />
2010 CACR Higher Education Cybersecurity Summit last week in Indianapolis, sponsored and hosted by Indiana University.  Links to archived video from each of the sessions throughout the day are available at the Summit website (<a href="http://www.indiana.edu/~uits/cacrsummit10/index.html)" target="_blank">http://www.indiana.edu/~uits/cacrsummit10/index.html)</a> under the Program and Speakers menu<br />
<br />
Fred Cate, from IU law school, opened the conference. Fred has testified before Congress on issues re: privacy and the Internet, and is very active in this area. I asked the first question when he finished and opened for questions. Basically, I wanted to know what the difference was anymore between China, essentially a police state Google is fleeing, and Australia's Internet censorship efforts, and the UK, where there are now more surveillance cameras than people, it seems, including the ones in public restrooms reported recently.<br />
<br />
Fred responded so assuringly (not), by recounting how DHS is pouring money for surveillance cameras into USA municipalities, without any regard to requiring policy and oversight regulation of how they are used, how material is archived, etc.<br />
<br />
After the session that was a free form discussion by five major schools privacy officers, I started to ask them what they would be doing in five years, since privacy would essentially be dead by then.<br />
<br />
Before lunch, the featured speaker was Bruce Schneier. <a href="http://www.schneier.com/" target="_blank">http://www.schneier.com/</a><br />
<br />
Ronald D. Edge<br />
Director of Information Services<br />
Indiana University Athletics<br />
Bloomington, IN]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New YouTube Design Horrendous, Unusable]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-63-post-158.html#pid158</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 05:27:55 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RDEdge</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-63-post-158.html#pid158</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[So to reiterate some points I made to Lauren in an email earlier this week (and I thought dealing with 50 - 100 emails a day was bad. Sorry, Lauren.):<br />
<br />
I tried to post a comment on your YouTube West Wing Remix video as HeartlandTuber, but the new comments interface is so f*cked up, I could not get it to post. First it refuses and throws and error if it thinks I have misspelled something, so I was unable to refer to "Faux Noise Nutwork", and how they do editing like this every day on all their reporting. <br />
<br />
Then I could not decode the frickin' captchas after a half dozen attempts, so I gave up for the moment in disgust.<br />
<br />
Feeling masochistic, I decided I would find the discussion forums. <br />
<br />
After finally locating a way to click through, I could read a thread on how bad the comments section and the whole redesign is. I wanted to contribute my thoughts. I found a button that said I needed to login to reply/participate.<br />
<br />
Well, I was ALREADY logged in to YouTube using my YouTube ID/Handle, and password. But OK, I click, and am taken to a basic Google login, that wants an email address and password.<br />
<br />
So I try my YouTube ID and PW. Fails, of course. I try the email address and PW the YouTube account was created and registered with, which works, because I have used it to request admin email, e.g. password change. Fails. I try another Google account I use for my online hobby business, which works just fine for logging in to Google Merchant Checkout. Fails. <br />
<br />
At this point, I reach the conclusion Google just does not want to hear my comments on the new redesign, so, having, like Lauren, to actually spend some time every day working to put bread on the table, I gave up trying.<br />
<br />
I think the new design at YouTube sucks heartily.  <br />
<br />
As I said in another email to Lauren, the designers apparently are unaware of <a href="http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com" target="_blank">http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com</a> and Herr Flander's dicta on good (and terrible) web design. They really, really need to review principles.<br />
<br />
The comments are just atrocious, the worst part being that you cannot see the ratings and event icons associated with each comment. You hover your mouse, and they appear. And by the time you have scrolled to the bottom of the comments you can see, you have nausea and vertigo induced by the flickering appearance and disappearing controls.<br />
<br />
Mystery meat navigation of the absolutely worst kind.<br />
<br />
FWIW, even navigating my own account profile, it took me a while to find my own playlist so I can play stuff while I worked.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[So to reiterate some points I made to Lauren in an email earlier this week (and I thought dealing with 50 - 100 emails a day was bad. Sorry, Lauren.):<br />
<br />
I tried to post a comment on your YouTube West Wing Remix video as HeartlandTuber, but the new comments interface is so f*cked up, I could not get it to post. First it refuses and throws and error if it thinks I have misspelled something, so I was unable to refer to "Faux Noise Nutwork", and how they do editing like this every day on all their reporting. <br />
<br />
Then I could not decode the frickin' captchas after a half dozen attempts, so I gave up for the moment in disgust.<br />
<br />
Feeling masochistic, I decided I would find the discussion forums. <br />
<br />
After finally locating a way to click through, I could read a thread on how bad the comments section and the whole redesign is. I wanted to contribute my thoughts. I found a button that said I needed to login to reply/participate.<br />
<br />
Well, I was ALREADY logged in to YouTube using my YouTube ID/Handle, and password. But OK, I click, and am taken to a basic Google login, that wants an email address and password.<br />
<br />
So I try my YouTube ID and PW. Fails, of course. I try the email address and PW the YouTube account was created and registered with, which works, because I have used it to request admin email, e.g. password change. Fails. I try another Google account I use for my online hobby business, which works just fine for logging in to Google Merchant Checkout. Fails. <br />
<br />
At this point, I reach the conclusion Google just does not want to hear my comments on the new redesign, so, having, like Lauren, to actually spend some time every day working to put bread on the table, I gave up trying.<br />
<br />
I think the new design at YouTube sucks heartily.  <br />
<br />
As I said in another email to Lauren, the designers apparently are unaware of <a href="http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com" target="_blank">http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com</a> and Herr Flander's dicta on good (and terrible) web design. They really, really need to review principles.<br />
<br />
The comments are just atrocious, the worst part being that you cannot see the ratings and event icons associated with each comment. You hover your mouse, and they appear. And by the time you have scrolled to the bottom of the comments you can see, you have nausea and vertigo induced by the flickering appearance and disappearing controls.<br />
<br />
Mystery meat navigation of the absolutely worst kind.<br />
<br />
FWIW, even navigating my own account profile, it took me a while to find my own playlist so I can play stuff while I worked.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Google's index claims my site is hacked or a phishing site! It's not! What can I do?]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-62-post-157.html#pid157</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:01:08 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-62-post-157.html#pid157</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[With extremely few exceptions, when Google's automated systems flag a Web site that way, something <b>is</b> wrong with that site.  <br />
<br />
However, it is not at all uncommon for a site operator to be <b>unaware</b> of situations caused by outside malicious hacking, contamination via viruses, or resulting from various other means without the owner's knowledge or consent.<br />
<br />
The best starting place to deal with such situations is to explore Google's <b>extremely</b> comprehensive <a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/">Webmaster Central</a>, which is a veritable cornucopia of write-ups, tools, advice, and other resources of tremendous use even to the smallest of Web sites.  (It's remarkable how many Web site owners tell me that they've never even heard of Webmaster Central until I clue them in!)<br />
<br />
Of particular interest in the context of hacked sites are <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#x26;answer=45432">Google's pages specifically addressing this and related issues</a> within Webmaster Central.<br />
<br />
Even if your site is 100% clean as a whistle, <a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/">Google's Webmaster Central</a> resources are definitely worth checking out for anyone interested in maintaining a good site reputation and the highest possible organic (natural) search rankings with Google.<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[With extremely few exceptions, when Google's automated systems flag a Web site that way, something <b>is</b> wrong with that site.  <br />
<br />
However, it is not at all uncommon for a site operator to be <b>unaware</b> of situations caused by outside malicious hacking, contamination via viruses, or resulting from various other means without the owner's knowledge or consent.<br />
<br />
The best starting place to deal with such situations is to explore Google's <b>extremely</b> comprehensive <a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/">Webmaster Central</a>, which is a veritable cornucopia of write-ups, tools, advice, and other resources of tremendous use even to the smallest of Web sites.  (It's remarkable how many Web site owners tell me that they've never even heard of Webmaster Central until I clue them in!)<br />
<br />
Of particular interest in the context of hacked sites are <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=45432">Google's pages specifically addressing this and related issues</a> within Webmaster Central.<br />
<br />
Even if your site is 100% clean as a whistle, <a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/">Google's Webmaster Central</a> resources are definitely worth checking out for anyone interested in maintaining a good site reputation and the highest possible organic (natural) search rankings with Google.<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How can I create a YouTube URL that starts playing at a specific place in a video?]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-61-post-156.html#pid156</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:42:13 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-61-post-156.html#pid156</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Easy as pie.  You simply need to add:<br />
<br />
#t=[mins&#93;m[secs[s&#93;<br />
<br />
to the end of a YouTube URL (where "mins" is minutes and "secs" is seconds of course!)<br />
<br />
For example, appending:<br />
<br />
#t=02m37s<br />
<br />
would seek the video to the 2 minute, 37 second point before starting playback: <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8y6ABOkNm8#t=02m37s"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8y6ABOkNm8#t=02m37s" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8y6ABOkNm8#t=02m37s</a></a><br />
<br />
Useful, eh?<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Easy as pie.  You simply need to add:<br />
<br />
#t=[mins]m[secs[s]<br />
<br />
to the end of a YouTube URL (where "mins" is minutes and "secs" is seconds of course!)<br />
<br />
For example, appending:<br />
<br />
#t=02m37s<br />
<br />
would seek the video to the 2 minute, 37 second point before starting playback: <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8y6ABOkNm8#t=02m37s"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8y6ABOkNm8#t=02m37s" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8y6ABOkNm8#t=02m37s</a></a><br />
<br />
Useful, eh?<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[What can I do about specific "inappropriate" Street View Images?]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-60-post-155.html#pid155</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:29:21 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-60-post-155.html#pid155</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Google <a href="http://maps.google.com/help/maps/streetview/faq.html#q6">provides a mechanism</a> to report any specific problematic images for removal consideration.  Google is typically quite responsive to these Street View reports, though it is usually unrealistic to expect immediate imagery changes given the scope of the Street View service, and there have been some exceptional cases where more effort has been required to get particular images removed.  If you run into problems regarding particular Street View image removal requests, please let me know and I'll try to be of assistance if possible.<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Google <a href="http://maps.google.com/help/maps/streetview/faq.html#q6">provides a mechanism</a> to report any specific problematic images for removal consideration.  Google is typically quite responsive to these Street View reports, though it is usually unrealistic to expect immediate imagery changes given the scope of the Street View service, and there have been some exceptional cases where more effort has been required to get particular images removed.  If you run into problems regarding particular Street View image removal requests, please let me know and I'll try to be of assistance if possible.<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Are Google Street View images "live"?]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-59-post-154.html#pid154</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:38:30 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-59-post-154.html#pid154</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[NO.  Street View imagery is photographed by vehicles that only travel any given road at infrequent intervals, and significant time elapses between these static photos being taken and their inclusion in Google Street View imagery.  For any given location the Street View imagery may actually be many months old -- often significantly older.<br />
<br />
Google is apparently experimenting with the inclusion of some available webcam "live" imagery within Street View, but this would only involve access to existing Webcams that can already be easily viewed via non-Google directories and mechanisms.<br />
<br />
As publicly available imagery, Google Street View is a highly useful resource.  On the other hand, the vast real-time Closed Circuit TV (CCTV) networks being deployed by many governments around the world, with imagery frequently used in ill-defined manners and indefinitely archived, are considered by many observers to be genuine risks to civil liberties without conferring significant actual public safety benefits.<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[NO.  Street View imagery is photographed by vehicles that only travel any given road at infrequent intervals, and significant time elapses between these static photos being taken and their inclusion in Google Street View imagery.  For any given location the Street View imagery may actually be many months old -- often significantly older.<br />
<br />
Google is apparently experimenting with the inclusion of some available webcam "live" imagery within Street View, but this would only involve access to existing Webcams that can already be easily viewed via non-Google directories and mechanisms.<br />
<br />
As publicly available imagery, Google Street View is a highly useful resource.  On the other hand, the vast real-time Closed Circuit TV (CCTV) networks being deployed by many governments around the world, with imagery frequently used in ill-defined manners and indefinitely archived, are considered by many observers to be genuine risks to civil liberties without conferring significant actual public safety benefits.<br />
<br />
--Lauren--]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[TW and Comcast exploring online access to broadcast and cable TV programming]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-15-post-153.html#pid153</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:25:55 -0700</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>WatZer</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-15-post-153.html#pid153</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi,<br />
<br />
I know this topic is more than 1 year old that is not active but because my TV just got broken last day I really need to watch television until  I saw this thread. Maybe there is still a chance, I can watch my favorite TV shows.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi,<br />
<br />
I know this topic is more than 1 year old that is not active but because my TV just got broken last day I really need to watch television until  I saw this thread. Maybe there is still a chance, I can watch my favorite TV shows.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Needed: Tools for Less Technical Consumers]]></title>
			<link>http://forums.gctip.org/thread-6-post-151.html#pid151</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:35:21 -0800</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JayKriz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forums.gctip.org/thread-6-post-151.html#pid151</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[If you don't have an idea to the connection of protocol, it might be better to call the tech support so that you may follow their advice to make you satisfy. You are the customer that might need some support from their services.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you don't have an idea to the connection of protocol, it might be better to call the tech support so that you may follow their advice to make you satisfy. You are the customer that might need some support from their services.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>